Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think it is a very bad idea for a single browser vendor to deliberately subvert standards process and attempt to steamroll the web with their own proprietary tech!


You're still not getting it. When there's only one browser to care about, it's easy to get it to support the latest and greatest standard.

W3C comes out with HTML6? Not supporting that would be terrible marketing, especially if other then-irrelevant browsers adopt it.


> W3C comes out with HTML6?

W3C's hasn't come out with anything HTML for a long time now. What we're calling HTML5 is spec'd by a Google-financed group of individuals (but mostly Chrome devs) collaborating at github.com/whatwg.

The last WHATWG HTML revision W3C has put into recommendation status is WHATWG HTML review draft published January, 2020. Last year's review draft was rejected due to privacy concerns, and also due to long standing issues with HTML5's so-called outlining algorithm ie the spec's written interpretation of heading levels for landmarks in navigation as a left-over from back when Ian Hickson was editor which didn't meet with the reality of what assistive technologies are actually doing. Meanwhile, the WHATWG spec has been edited (by a long-term W3C efitor) but no new consensus for a new W3C HTML recommendation has been achieved [1].

[1]: https://sgmljs.net/blog/blog2303.html


No I get it, but it strongly disagree.

I care about more than one browser.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: