Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Edit: please disregard, the California senate bill seems to actually be a reference to the number's existing use.

Given that it's a reference to a specific California prop, I don't think this is a problem in any way.




> it's a reference to a specific California prop

That seems like a retcon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)


I had no idea, I had only heard about it from the bill... Thank you for correcting me!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: