'Dynamic Programming' has to be the worst name for a concept in all of computer science. I can never remember what it refers to. Then, now and then, I come across something interesting that makes it seem like a big deal, look it up, roll my eyes and immediately forget it again.
It was only named 'dynamic programming' because its inventor thought is was a more marketable name:
"I spent the Fall quarter (of 1950) at RAND. My first task was to find a name for multistage decision processes. An interesting question is, ‘Where did the name, dynamic programming, come from?’ The 1950s were not good years for mathematical research. We had a very interesting gentleman in Washington named Wilson. He was Secretary of Defense, and he actually had a pathological fear and hatred of the word, research. I’m not using the term lightly; I’m using it precisely. His face would suffuse, he would turn red, and he would get violent if people used the term, research, in his presence. You can imagine how he felt, then, about the term, mathematical. The RAND Corporation was employed by the Air Force, and the Air Force had Wilson as its boss, essentially. Hence, I felt I had to do something to shield Wilson and the Air Force from the fact that I was really doing mathematics inside the RAND Corporation. What title, what name, could I choose? In the first place I was interested in planning, in decision making, in thinking. But planning, is not a good word for various reasons. I decided therefore to use the word, ‘programming.’ I wanted to get across the idea that this was dynamic, this was multistage, this was time-varying—I thought, let’s kill two birds with one stone. Let’s take a word that has an absolutely precise meaning, namely dynamic, in the classical physical sense. It also has a very interesting property as an adjective, and that is it’s impossible to use the word, dynamic, in a pejorative sense. Try thinking of some combination that will possibly give it a pejorative meaning. It’s impossible. Thus, I thought dynamic programming was a good name. It was something not even a Congressman could object to. So I used it as an umbrella for my activities”.
From: Richard Bellman, Eye of the Hurricane: An Autobiography (1984, page 159)
I like the name Algorithmic Induction, or Inductive Programming.
Just like how in an (strongly) inductive proof you use facts from Fact(0)..Fact(n) to prove Fact(n+1), with inductive programming you're using results from Result(0)..Result(n) to compute Result(n+1).
