Disagree. Dark Sky was fantastic in the PNW, where the main concerns are just how rainy it will be that day, and the approximate high temperatures coming up. Nothing accurately forecasts (here) whether it will be freezing or whether precipitation will be snow/slush/hail/rain, but other apps like Apple's are absolutely horrific at forecasting precipitation even a few hours out. Stuff like showing 30% chance of rain in 1 hour, clear the rest of the day, when it just rains the entire day and the "forecast" continually shows that it will stop raining in 30 minutes.
> Dark Sky is great at answering the weather questions of people who live in places where rain showers are short lasting; where temperatures range from ‘cool’ to ‘hot’; and where storms are infrequent, special events. Basically people whose interaction with the weather hinges on ‘do I need a jacket?’
> Disagree. Dark Sky was fantastic in the PNW
I think you're actually in complete agreement with OP
Right? ‘It’s not only for Northern California! It works fine up as far as Seattle!’ is not exactly a refutation of my (slightly hyperbolically stated) thesis that Dark Sky’s human friendliness is not as global as people seem to think.
When does the temperature drop to freezing and negative windchill in PNW like OP mentioned were use cases not designed into the app as it is not of the target audience with areas of mild weather.
