The interesting plot is SPM.5 on p.23 of the summary for policymakers. There the emission scenarios are plotted and the thing is, the scenarios that limit warming to 1.5 K or 2 K assume actively putting greenhouse gasses back into the ground starting in the late 40ies or the late 60ies respectively. If anybody has a idea of to get the kind of policy buy in that could do something like that, I would be very interested -- otherwise fig. SPM.3 suggests Seattle should be one of the nicer places even at the more unpleasant scenarios.
Site thinks I'm an evil bot (its words, not mine) and doesn't let me access whatever is behind this link. Feels weird, isn't the IPCC some government thing? What issue would there be with bots downloading their papers that they need to use secret algorithms to decide who gets access and who doesn't?
