On: Glaze: Protecting artists from style mimicry

[j16sdiz]

> it also violated the GPL license of DiffusionBee.

Isn't "critic" / "research" / "education" good fair-use cases?

[p_l → j16sdiz]

This is creation of derivative art and publishing it in violation of license.

Fair use is violated by the scale of copy-paste involved, and well, none of "critic", "research", or "education" are the uses involved in the release of the derived art. (Writing a paper would fall under "research", iirc)

[GaggiX → j16sdiz]

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLFairUse

I don't know how small the snippet has to be to be considered fair in court, but it looks like they copied large portion of code.

[bawolff → j16sdiz]

Whether this counts as that seems like a complex question. Certainly i don't see how this is a critique.