> Short of literally superimposing fixed images of the moon on top of people's photos, which this is not doing,
it is 95% doing exactly that. taking your blurry moon, putting what it knows about the real moon on top of it, and doing an incredibly precise photoshop job to merge them together. it's using real world photos in a hardcoded database to substitute information directly into your photos, just in a very sophisticated way.
it's completely gross and I would want no part of this on my camera.
it is 95% doing exactly that. taking your blurry moon, putting what it knows about the real moon on top of it, and doing an incredibly precise photoshop job to merge them together. it's using real world photos in a hardcoded database to substitute information directly into your photos, just in a very sophisticated way.
it's completely gross and I would want no part of this on my camera.