Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It does make sense to avoid having servers that saturate their link with a zillion identical downloads on every deploy; but I wonder why they went for BitTorrent, rather than using multicast the way e.g. Windows enterprise installs do it.



Coz you need working multicast across entire network or server-per-datacenter to multicast (and data still needs to get to that server).

It's much simpler to just point a server to torrent tracker and let them exchange stuff between themselves




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: