On: Striking portraits, claimed to be original, were g...

[madaxe_again]

Do we? Marcel Duchamp springs to mind. He’d just pick up an object and declare it art. Piero Manzoni shat in cans. If that’s a creative process, I am positively proliferous.

[amelius → madaxe_again]

This only supports the argument that it's not the qualities of the final product that make something art.

[madaxe_again → amelius]

I disagree, but even if I let you have that point, what about Cariou v. Prince? If taking a photograph of someone else’s photograph is legally considered a novel work, then how does AI differ?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cariou_v._Prince

[amelius → madaxe_again]

Well, apparently, it differs in the sense that people don't call the final product art.

[madaxe_again → amelius]

They do.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriation_(art)