Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Consider the alternative. In an environment where prosecution can merely inconvenience the perpetrator, every action is just the basic math of “gain - (penalty times chance of getting caught)”.

We already see that calculus in many corporate wrongdoings. It is not beneficial for the rule of law.




That is a false dilemma between 'a life in jail' and 'merely inconvenience'. For non-violent but severe crimes, single-digit years in jail seems to me as adequate punishment. Severe enough to blow away rational calculation, but not life-destroying.


I'm not sure whether I would call crushing fines necessarily less of an inconvenience than jail?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: