Yes... but how many times can you pull off ANOM? It worked really well once - but by the time there's the 5th, or 6th, or 7th security company that criminals have never heard of and a long string of dead companies, they'll be quite wary.
I'm sure dedicated people can be more creative than to just do ANOM 7 times but I do get your point.
Anyway, I realized after I wrote the comment that ANOM is a bad example for arguing in favor of ubiquitous end-to-end encryption (E2EE).
ANOM is only attractive to criminal organizations because other forms of "E2EE" are not resilient to government snooping.
It's kind of an interesting point but I do personally land on a preference for ubiquitous E2EE.
Ultimately, I suspect the resources of law enforcement would win out given enough creativity from officers but, unfortunately, the current ecosystem does not require them to be creative.
