I was surprised by how the author called out Fuller's race at the end of the article as if that had to do with anything. The article read well up to that point, I was being convinced of his thesis. But after seeing his race comment tagged on at the end, I have to discount Martinez's whole presentation; there is a high probability it's just another woke hit-piece. I wish he would have put the racial stuff at the beginning of his writing so I could have ignored him sooner.
It sadly attaches wokeness to a very complete, well-written biography that carries none of that political/religious baggage. Though seeing that it was in The Nation should alert one to an agenda.
