Why start with the "you're wrong and I'm right premise"?. The author suggests that science is the only path forward and especially that their science is the right science to follow.
The best advice I've read is from Ross Edgley in one of his books who said to "Train as often as you need to, not as often as you can."
I just find some of these arguments to be silly. Both groups of people obtain similar results whether one of the groups is doing more or doing it "wrong". There has to be a margin of error in this that shows these arguments largely don't matter.
The body is adaptable. Those doing low intensity high volume vs. high intensity low volume is the same argument of strength improves stamina and vice versa most of the time in a 80/20 (aerobic/anaerobic) fashion. Both groups adapt.
The best advice I've read is from Ross Edgley in one of his books who said to "Train as often as you need to, not as often as you can."
I just find some of these arguments to be silly. Both groups of people obtain similar results whether one of the groups is doing more or doing it "wrong". There has to be a margin of error in this that shows these arguments largely don't matter.
The body is adaptable. Those doing low intensity high volume vs. high intensity low volume is the same argument of strength improves stamina and vice versa most of the time in a 80/20 (aerobic/anaerobic) fashion. Both groups adapt.