> Are they trained and used to judge things not fitting to the patterns (shape, behaviour, position, ...) of human made objects? Trained in the 'impossible'? I assumed their training has bounds on how human made objects behave.
Presumably they are trained on distinguishing aircraft from birds and weather balloons. If they see something "impossible" given that training, then there's clearly something that needs an explanation.
Presumably they are trained on distinguishing aircraft from birds and weather balloons. If they see something "impossible" given that training, then there's clearly something that needs an explanation.