> it omits certain things while documenting other things that appear to be fictional
This describes nearly all engineering documentation I've seen. In many cases hobbyists having reverse-engineered how something works are better off than if they had been given the official documentation.
I assume this happens when something is designed to do a thing, documentation is written, then the design is updated or bugs fixed or flow changed to handle a situation, and documentation never gets redone to match.
This describes nearly all engineering documentation I've seen. In many cases hobbyists having reverse-engineered how something works are better off than if they had been given the official documentation.