Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> it's just good policy

Is there any empirical data on the safety benefits of a second stairwell?



In the spirit of curiosity - how would you go about measuring that? A counterfactual is almost impossible.

That being said - when in doubt, I favor more regulation for safety, not less.


> how would you go about measuring that?

Death and injury frequencies. Anecdotes of preventable deaths, e.g. where one stairwell was not enough versus where a corridor separating two stairwells became, itself, an obstacle. Drill simulations.

We should have have some basis for the rule. (If we don't, I'd support scrapping it.)


You could measure it by people who perish in structure fires, a metric on which America is far behind Europe.


This got me curious. Best i could find was the CTIF (The International Association of Fire and Rescue Services) [1] and their annual report [2].

Table 1.2 shows a breakdown of fire deaths per 100 fires. US 0.3 France, Germany 0.1 Greece, UK, Belgium 0.2 Poland, Denmark, Slovakia 0.4

So it's a bit of a mixed bag. The reported average was 0.5 (report didn't cover every country). Sadly Canada wasn't in the table.

Japan at 3.8 was a bit of a surprise.

1. https://ctif.org/world-fire-statistics 2. https://ctif.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/CTIF_Report27_E...


You'd need to weigh that against the costs and lost opportunities. If no one can buy an affordable apartment and overengineering is part of the cause, or if many die because of a car-centric culture because you can't built densely enough, that can be a problem.


I'd wager most of the US deaths occur in single-family homes--in basements (illegally housed), or even while sleeping in rooms with plenty of opportunity for egress.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: