> Without death and scarcity we could never have evolved.
Without disease, we would have never evolved an immune system. Therefore we shouldn't try to cure disease.
I think the flaw is very clear in this analogy: human ingenuity and science is better than evolution by natural selection in pretty much every way. Now that we've evolved science, we no longer need evolution by natural selection.
Without disease, we would have never evolved an immune system. Therefore we shouldn't try to cure disease.
I think the flaw is very clear in this analogy: human ingenuity and science is better than evolution by natural selection in pretty much every way. Now that we've evolved science, we no longer need evolution by natural selection.