I tried correcting the origins of the first prototype of the Docker software on Wikipedia. The people I worked with at the time can confirm the story of course. But Wikipedia will not take our words as we are the literal primary sources. Instead they want secondary accounting. Which happens to be whatever was shared to journalist years later by people that weren't there initially or didn't design and write the code.
This is annoying at a personal level (resumé looks better with a wikipedia mention). It did opene my eyes on how history recounting really works though.
This is annoying at a personal level (resumé looks better with a wikipedia mention). It did opene my eyes on how history recounting really works though.