The breakdown of MAID by main condition is interesting, and suggests that the vast majority (~70%) are cancer patients avoiding a painful, prolonged and terrible death.
This would also suggest that once we get even better at cancer treatments, the rate of people dying to MAID will drop dramatically.
Later in the stats, ~80% of people have lost the ability to engage in activities of daily life (which IMO is a terrible place to be).
I don't think your reference supports your claim at all. In fact, it suggests that it's doing exactly what it is meant to do: ending unnecessary suffering for those who are dying of diseases we don't yet have a cure to.
There have also been many reports of people, mostly disabled, who are unable to work or afford rent in Ontario, who have applied to medically assisted death rather than face homelessness. This might be both brinksmanship and gamesmanship, but it's extremely distasteful that we are here as a society.
Your claim requires some specific evidence (reports meaning one, two, ten?), and that would need to be both weighed against the immense relief in suffering enjoyed by the people who are demonstrably benefiting now, as well as the freedom for people to control their own destiny.
This would also suggest that once we get even better at cancer treatments, the rate of people dying to MAID will drop dramatically.
Later in the stats, ~80% of people have lost the ability to engage in activities of daily life (which IMO is a terrible place to be).
I don't think your reference supports your claim at all. In fact, it suggests that it's doing exactly what it is meant to do: ending unnecessary suffering for those who are dying of diseases we don't yet have a cure to.