I'm probably not going to convince you but I just read through the most recent ones and they are not that surprising. To me I would summarize the story as "there was debate inside the company about whether or not to ban Trump", which is a an unsurprising non-headline. In the files there are interesting arguments on both sides but ultimately there is (to me, and I'm guessing maybe not to you?) a clear argument as to why he ultimately got banned after some internal back and forth. He incited violence with his tweets.
