Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> The challenge is when you throw in an ad-based revenue model

The funny thing is - the ad-based revenue model is not the only possible variant. Last time I’ve checked Facebook’s profits per user were $7 per quarter, that is $28 a year. At the same time I am paying LiveJournal $25 a year for the ad-free version. Just taking my money looks like a much better model in many respects:

- less overhead: a lot of people doing these studies how to force me to look at something I do not want to look at will be free to do something more useful to the society;

- streamlined relationship between me and my publisher: in this model there is no advertiser who can say “I do not like these texts, no revenue for you”.

That’s why I prefer to pay for some Substack authors, like Matt Taibbi and Glen Greenwald, than to try to fish their texts for free amid some sea of “clever” advertising (hey AI testers, I bought this thing already, what’s the point of forcing it on me again and again?).

I kinda wish that Brave model (my money distributed between sites I visited) got more traction. It looks much more healthy.




The number of people willing to use Facebook today vastly exceeds the number willing to pay $25/yr to use Facebook.

I bet by at least 4 orders of magnitude and likely 5 or 6.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: