Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The fact they said it was "mistakenly added" to a policy document that had to go through multiple layers of management and lawyers before becoming public makes it hard to believe it was ever an accident. I'm more curious who is lobbying for such a condition in the first place.



ESG is more than likely the cause - https://investor.pypl.com/esg-strategy/default.aspx


Can you elaborate? I don't feel like gesturing broadly at a concept is really making whatever point you intend to make.


> We strive to ensure our platform is safe and secure for all to use and expect all customers to comply with our Acceptable Use Policy, which outlines prohibited activities and conduct, including the use of our services to promote hate, violence and intolerance (including racial intolerance). We take this responsibility seriously and conduct independent investigations of product misuse using all available information, while also working to proactively identify instances of noncompliance.

https://s26.q4cdn.com/519805829/files/doc_downloads/PayPal-2...

> Compliant, ethical & humane use of our products


This is primarily a way for PayPal to take money from people, but it is also a way to bully people that PayPal is mistreating into silence: not worth getting dinged $2,500 every time you post a tweet critical of PayPal for stealing from you


Or a way to avoid platforms that are only viable by producing misinformation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: