Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But the Economist is affordable all the world over. At least the subscription is.

I read that in a book (http://www.amazon.com/Everyday-Ingenuity-Solve-Problems-Smal...) that the usual TV station makes less than a dollar for an hours advertisement per viewer. The Economist makes more than five dollars in advertisements per issue.

Most people would rather spend a dollar to get rid of one hour advertising on TV, but not many would spend more than five dollars to get rid of the relative unobstrusive ads in the Economist.



I love that book. And I love Honest Tea.

It's still significantly more expensive than the average magazine in the States.

http://www.micro-gems.net/servlet/the-386/The-Economist-1yr-...

Now certainly $80 is affordable (if you have a job), but most of the magazines I used to subscribe to, I paid $5-$20 per year.


How many issues do the magazines for $20 a year have in a year? Too bad, you can't get a magazine that cheaply here in Germany.

By the way: There is a website to the 'Why not?'-book (http://www.whynot.net/). It tries to be a web-2.0 idea exchange. But browsing it did not gratify me as much as reading their book.

Especially I like 'What would Croesus do?' (How would you solve your problem if resources were unconstrained?) and 'Find new problems for your solutions.'.


economist is weekly. 4x20 = 80. it is exactly on par with most magazines. and considering the quality you're getting a bargain.


Subscribing to the economist is on par if you buy all your other magazines from a news stand - yes.

I agree it's well worth it. My original argument was that it's expensive compared to most magazines, which it is.


I'm still not getting this. 51 issues a year for $80 equates to $1.57 an issue. this does not seem expensive at all.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: