Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

95 years is “time limited” you may not like the time.



Yeah right. 1000 years is technically time limited, you may not like it but that's life buddy! Just accept our rent seeking and pay us our royalties for a thousand years because our grand grand grand children need to live comfortably off of the works.

What a load of total BS. We're doing them a favor by granting them artificial scarcity at all. We can easily make it last 0 years if we want. We have the technology.


Well the alternative is that they wouldn’t have created the content in the first place. How much free content have you created?

We have the technology to walk into a mall and kill dozens of people. Since when is “we have technology to do $x” the justification for saying a law is invalid?


> Well the alternative is that they wouldn’t have created the content in the first place.

Lie. People created works before copyright and they will continue to do so afterwards.

> How much free content have you created?

Pretty much every line of code I've ever written. I've also provided my services for plenty of people free of charge.

> Since when is “we have technology to do $x” the justification for saying a law is invalid?

Since these rent seekers showed up.


People created blockbuster movies that they spent millions on computer special effects, computer animated cartoons or films at all before copyright existed in the 1500s? Before mass distribution existed you bought tickets to see plays in person.

You also don’t seem to know rent seeking means

> Rent seeking is an economic concept that occurs when an entity seeks to gain wealth without any reciprocal contribution of productivity.

Are the people producing the media not contributing anything? It seems the people who want everything for free are the ones who aren’t making a meaningful contribution




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: