This is not just the homeless, there was a post on HN from a librarian talking about the same issues for the elderly and socially disadvantaged. The issue is that Google forces 2FA on them, even if they otherwise don’t have a phone.
This post was also very misleading. The concerns the librarian raised were actually addressed. The doc was old and made public by somebody other than the librarian, who edited it after it blew up to make it clear that the content was out of date.
======
Addition, 08/02/2022, 3:03pm: I don’t know how this got shared to HackerNews. I appreciate all of the positive responses we have gotten. However, this was not an open letter. It was meant to be shared internally to Google. It went directly to the security team and we had a conversation about it about a year ago. Things have improved significantly since then and this is no longer a daily problem. Please stop calling the branch or emailing me about it. It’s interfering with my work. Press inquiries can be made through https://libwww.freelibrary.org/contact/ and the public relations department will be in touch with you.
If you want to learn more about patron privacy and support librarians advocating for patron privacy and against big tech please check out https://libraryfreedom.org/ which is a wonderful organization I am a part of that does work like this. I still firmly believe in and stand by everything that I wrote. But this particular action was not meant to be a public letter.
Also! If you’re in Philadelphia you should check out this big program we’re doing on August 12th called Empathy Versus Misinformation where a panel of experts will address questions and misconceptions about transgender youth!! Boy am I relieved that this was a Google Doc and I can just put whatever I want onto the front page of HackerNews now :)
> Doesn't sound like it was completely resolved. In fact, it sounds like Google may have treated it as a "squeaky wheel," and only that library is getting better help.
So on one hand we've got the actual author of the original document saying one thing and on the other hand we've got an uninvolved internet poster saying something else.
