The quote was "According to SOME estimates ...", FWIW. But even your phrasing is a far cry from the attempt to infer that it was "stolen", which is the clear implication of the hyberbole above.
And in fact that was spun too, because (as you read farther down the linked debunking) the original quote was "$2.3 trillion were unsupported by reliable explanatory information and audit trails or were made to invalid general ledger accounts", which doesn't even support "cannot track". In fact, per that statement, we can track it, we know where it went, we just don't know why or in some cases to precise recipients.
Those are accounting failings. They're bad. A system with failings like that is certainly going to be subject to exploitation and fraud. For sure they should fix it (and to some extend did). But to claim that all of that $2.3T was fraudulent is just a plain lie.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2022/09/fact-check-donald...