Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was a little imprecise on my words. It would lose recent writes seemingly randomly, and reading those back would fail. It seemed that caches could mask this for a while.

POSIX systems are pretty lax with this sort of failure. write(2) and close(2) can succeed if you write to cache. If the actual write failure occurs later there is typically no way to let your process know.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: