If Java survival is to be attributed to the talent of its developers, isn't this the "Java culture" the post is talking about, which is supposed to be the problem?
The culture can both exhibit the problems author describes and create the foundation for its culture to be great at security.
Thing is, if I look at most places hiring Java devs, they are prominently places that care a lot about security. Wouldn't it be a self-fulfilling prophecy then, that Java culture cares more about security and tries to maintain higher standards? Especially considering Java was dominant for decades in places willing to pay big for security.
I just don't see why that would also mean it's directly atrributable to the language itself to the point it is 'the most'. C# exists too, it's not that different.
