Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That’s already the case with most types of insurance. It ran out? You haven’t paid bills? and your house was hit by a tornado right after it ran out? Tough luck.

That said it may have a “using this feature binds you to a new agreement where you pay for all the time you discontinued our service”




I don’t think insurance is a good analog because insurance has very high payouts.

Not sure the cost for this feature but the marginal cost is likely really low. So a day of coverage would maybe cost a few cents or dollars since they are already including 2 years free without raising the price.

This is very different from a day of homeowners insurance where the payout is hundreds of thousands or millions. The marginal cost on insurance is very high.


This is different from insurance in that insurance has very few, but large payouts shared by many small cost subscriptions.

But it is like insurance in that it is a (likely very) large upfront cost for Apple that needs to be shared by many small subscriptions.

If no one has to pay for it until they need it, the venture from Apple's side goes in the red.

Disclaimer: Speculating on the likely economy of it, I don't know.


I'd equate this more to not paying your phone bill.

Your phone can still call emergency services, even without a SIM card.


Our inReaches and SPOTs can't. No service, they're little more than bricks.


Insurance is to make you whole financially after the fact not to response to a life and death emergency in the moment. This theory has been tried in at least one location wherein you were expected to pay annually for fire service or the fire department wouldn't put out your house and would instead insure that the fire didn't spread to the paying customers while they watched your home burn.

It's abhorrent. We ensure cell phones can always call 911 even without a plan for instance which unlike insurance is a nearly identical situation. The logical thing to do is just take it out of the hands of service providers by always requiring carriage of such a call in all circumstances and expecting OEMs/service providers to make back that money on device or service wherein such a device includes that function.


I would accept your argument if all handsets had this functionality built in. As it is now, only forthcoming devices from one MFG is availing this as an additional paid service with free introductory period.

If I had an Iridium handset and the sub ran out and I was adrift, would I still be able to make an emergency call?

On the other hand maybe let it fallback as a PLB.


If the law said you must provide carriage for that call as it does for terrestrial 911 you would have the option of exiting the US market or doing it.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: