Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Depending on how I/O is handled, container I/O can be very slow, whereas a dedicated disk snapshot without CoW/overlays would be much faster.

Do you mean VM I/O can be very slow? I don't think containers should have any overhead, please correct me if I'm wrong though.




Container file I/O is very slow. It unpacks the OCI image layers onto the regular host filesystem, then adds overlay filesystems, does copy-on-write, and references files between each layer. For example, doing 10 containerized nodejs app builds simultaneously will swamp the host with iowait. A common hack to is to put the OCI file tree / overlays on a dedicated disk with much higher iops than the boot disk.


> It unpacks the OCI image layers onto the regular host filesystem, then adds overlay filesystems, does copy-on-write, and references files between each layer.

That's just Docker though, right? Does LXC or systemd-nspawn do that?


Thank you, I'll have to look into this. I was thinking from a file namespacing perspective there shouldn't be overhead, but it makes sense that adding the overlay filesystems and mounts would impact performance.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: