This is perfectly going to fly if they find one small chat where he admits he merely knows that his code was used for money laundering.
If memory serves me correctly, the ground for convicting Phantom Secure was the fact that one of the founders admitted that he knew that his service caters to criminals, although the service itself is not illegal.
If memory serves me correctly, the ground for convicting Phantom Secure was the fact that one of the founders admitted that he knew that his service caters to criminals, although the service itself is not illegal.