> that accurately reflect the current ethical landscape, instead of the ethical landscape of software in the 1990s and 2000s
This seems like it provides exactly the reason why we shouldn't have such a thing. What is the ethical landscape of the 2040s going to look like compared to today?
By that token, we shouldn’t have open source at all, even in the OSI’s approved form. After all, it’s a direct product of a historical ethical landscape, one that shaped our current landscape.
This seems like it provides exactly the reason why we shouldn't have such a thing. What is the ethical landscape of the 2040s going to look like compared to today?