Or maybe just people that can't even run a basic personal risk analysis and simple experiment.
To trial it personally has potentially many orders of magnitude greater upside than downside, so endless pondering and postulating is totally pointless vs just trying it out and see if it works for you.
Tests and studies are not the most reliable way of indicating personal benefits or side effects, in numerous cases have been contrary, incomplete, poorly applied or calculated and represent a population (which may or may not be representative of your individual case).
Regardless, NIH seems to be on board, but feel free not to take it, or take it with a negative opinion and stimulate the nocebo effect - to a certain extent you get what you wish for and that works both ways.
To trial it personally has potentially many orders of magnitude greater upside than downside, so endless pondering and postulating is totally pointless vs just trying it out and see if it works for you.
Tests and studies are not the most reliable way of indicating personal benefits or side effects, in numerous cases have been contrary, incomplete, poorly applied or calculated and represent a population (which may or may not be representative of your individual case).
Regardless, NIH seems to be on board, but feel free not to take it, or take it with a negative opinion and stimulate the nocebo effect - to a certain extent you get what you wish for and that works both ways.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664031/#:~:tex....