It’s ok, I’m not expecting an ism zealot to want to seek understanding. That’s a huge part of the larger issue.
But you did manage to provide a fantastic example for me. I appreciate that. From your entering the scene like a MLM stereotype, all the way to that last response. Fantastic, really. More than I hoped for.
That being said, you aren’t legitimately interested in discussion, at least outside of your area of interest, to put it gently, and I really don’t want to upset you any more than I already have. That last comment looked like a struggle for you. Don’t feel like you have to respond.
It’s ok. You missed the several times I pointed out that’s what I’m trying to get at, that it isn’t a solved problem of identification, or even terminology. You almost commented on that as a difficulty. Couldn’t keep from making it negative, but again that’s to be expected.
It is a frustrating problem. Your frustration isn’t unique. There’s not a lot of easy explanations in old books. That would indeed be a comfort. Humans keep seeking it.
Having a change of heart? Or preparing another barb?
But you did manage to provide a fantastic example for me. I appreciate that. From your entering the scene like a MLM stereotype, all the way to that last response. Fantastic, really. More than I hoped for.
That being said, you aren’t legitimately interested in discussion, at least outside of your area of interest, to put it gently, and I really don’t want to upset you any more than I already have. That last comment looked like a struggle for you. Don’t feel like you have to respond.