Regarding performance of responses I am referring to count of unique respondents meeting minimum requirements.
Regarding 'better candidates', this is based upon the count of candidates which made it through team interviews and coding challenges.
Our process requires multiple manager/leader approvals at each step of the process which is intended to reduce bias.
It is possible the soft attributes of personality and communication are reflected better in one group than the other. I do not have evidence but is a possible source of unintended bias.
Regarding performance of responses I am referring to count of unique respondents meeting minimum requirements.
Regarding 'better candidates', this is based upon the count of candidates which made it through team interviews and coding challenges.
Our process requires multiple manager/leader approvals at each step of the process which is intended to reduce bias.
It is possible the soft attributes of personality and communication are reflected better in one group than the other. I do not have evidence but is a possible source of unintended bias.