Ironic since you are the one making the claim and have not produced any references. I can’t prove they don’t exist but you could easily counter if one did.
that is chock full of balanced references if anyone is so inclined to peruse them and takes a critical examination at the various publications and the arguments can be evaluated solely on merits alone. There is continued research in this area but so far no smoking gun as to causality.
There are no meta-analyses I know of on your specific claim as there is a lack of primary research in human subjects to even substantiate it.
> Most likely they don't actually know any endocrinologists
I’m a practicing academic internist. I know endocrinologists both personally and professionally. This is absolutely irrelevant though as the literature is available for you.
> Some people just feel compelled to jump up and defend sugar
I did nothing of the sort. I treat diabetes and hyperlipidemia on the daily - that would be ridiculous.
Edit: oh and I missed your edit - a reference to Perlmutter? A celebrity neurologist who has widely been debunked for making wildly unsubstantiated claims. You are not arguing in good faith. You have the entirety of PubMed and Google scholar on which to reference peer reviewed literature - some of it is also crap - but you aren’t even doing that - you are sticking to the lowest quality unsubstantiated celebrity bilge.
Ironic since you are the one making the claim and have not produced any references. I can’t prove they don’t exist but you could easily counter if one did.
Furthermore I linked to one peer reviewed review article, again https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4078442/
that is chock full of balanced references if anyone is so inclined to peruse them and takes a critical examination at the various publications and the arguments can be evaluated solely on merits alone. There is continued research in this area but so far no smoking gun as to causality.
There are no meta-analyses I know of on your specific claim as there is a lack of primary research in human subjects to even substantiate it.
> Most likely they don't actually know any endocrinologists
I’m a practicing academic internist. I know endocrinologists both personally and professionally. This is absolutely irrelevant though as the literature is available for you.
> Some people just feel compelled to jump up and defend sugar
I did nothing of the sort. I treat diabetes and hyperlipidemia on the daily - that would be ridiculous.
Edit: oh and I missed your edit - a reference to Perlmutter? A celebrity neurologist who has widely been debunked for making wildly unsubstantiated claims. You are not arguing in good faith. You have the entirety of PubMed and Google scholar on which to reference peer reviewed literature - some of it is also crap - but you aren’t even doing that - you are sticking to the lowest quality unsubstantiated celebrity bilge.