Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is correct and Medicare Part D came in under budget due to private negotiation of drug prices.

I love how accurate posts on HN get aggressively downvoted off they go against the narrative.




The fact is that a manufacturer sells a product at 80% gross margin to a distributor. Attempting to negotiate with the manufacturer is illegal. The resellers of said product go through an intense competitive process and earn a 2-4% margin. So the plans will offer cheap loss leaders… “free metformin!” and make it up elsewhere. Meanwhile, the government is paying $5/pill for some amoxicillin reformulation or whatever.

What “narrative” are you upset about again? Personally, I don’t think getting a stream of risk-free government guaranteed business should yield higher margins than coke dealers.


That's not how it works at all.

This is Medicare Part D - the plans are administered by private insurance companies - Medicare just pays the premiums, they don't pay directly for the drugs.. Private insurers compete for Medicare patients to sign up for their plans.

Private insurers do negotiate directly with manufacturers. Studies I've seen show they get similar (or better!) price they do with their private insurance plans.

The narrative I'm complaining about is - "there is no negotiation". This comments are typically by people who don't even know how it works.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: