Disagree. I'd even call required rotation a smell.
Requiring rotation leads to people coming up with passwords more frequently, meaning they'll likely choose weaker passwords. On top of that, regular rotation isn't necessary for passwords generated independently by a password manager.
The issue here is that there's no way to deal with revocation / password changes if a service is compromised.
I responded to that in the original comment. Whether or not a service requires rotation (bad practice), this tool won't work (can't handle compromised passwords).
Disagree. I'd even call required rotation a smell.
Requiring rotation leads to people coming up with passwords more frequently, meaning they'll likely choose weaker passwords. On top of that, regular rotation isn't necessary for passwords generated independently by a password manager.
The issue here is that there's no way to deal with revocation / password changes if a service is compromised.