Moreover, if abortion is murder, then there ought be no exception for rape, as killing children for psychological relief ought be a repugnant exchange.
And the insurance companies, doctors, and medical groups involved are basically in an industry of assembly line baby murder for money. The culpability of doctors cannot be the same.
Pro-choice people seem to want it both ways when it comes to exceptions for rape. If there is an exception for rape, they say the pro-life law is bad because "see, it's not really about the lives of the children, it's just to control women's sexual choices". And if there's not an exception for rape, they say the pro-life law is bad because "look at all these really young rape victims who will now be forced to bear their rapists' children".
Thanks for reminding me why the only correct person to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy is the mother, no matter how much you may dislike the outcome.
My point is that if you're against an exception for rape victims, then any arguments you make against pro-life laws that only apply when such an exception doesn't exist should be completely discounted.
Huh? I am against such "exceptions" because I don't think there's any good result where the government has the right to force women to remain pregnant even when they have compelling reasons to not want to do so.
Abortion should be criminal when it can't done safely or is not done by a suitably trained professional, that's the only case I do accept a law is needed. And the US is going to see a lot more of such abortions in coming months/years.
And the insurance companies, doctors, and medical groups involved are basically in an industry of assembly line baby murder for money. The culpability of doctors cannot be the same.