It looks like you need to use an empty string and you can tell it to translate to None. That's better than nothing, but it's still basically an inability to use actual null here.
I think I'm misunderstanding you, but StrictYAML's biggest departure from YAML is that it doesn't try to guess types at all. Everything is decoded as a string by default until you specify otherwise with its schema system.
Here you can use `NullNone` to parse `null` into None.
It doesn't guess, but also the data can't tell it. It's not just that you get a string by default, it's that everything starts as a string and then goes through post-processing. If you want to distinguish between 'any string' and 'not a string', you can't.
> Here you can use `NullNone` to parse `null` into None.
That's the worst possible outcome for poor Christopher Null.
The best you can do for him is use "a:" to mean null but at that point you're not really dealing with nulls, you've just gone with strings and used an empty string.
But the solution is to make it impossible to write 「null」 at all? I don't think I would have suggested that one...