Half of these projects are so general that are laughable, a quarter is so ambitious that a small prize would play 0 role in the potential development of the solution.
Less:
Solve world peace.
Create "dynamic" organizations.
Establish a colony in Titan.
More:
- Increase by Z the yield of X staple in Y country within the next 5 years.
- Integrate 1 million people to the Internet for less than 1 USD/month/person.
The whole idea is for you to come up with a project, that's whythey are general. Not sure why people need detailed instructions to innovate and get funded.
Your "more" section lacks a purpose. You mention price of "connection" without additional details. One could argue that the main benefit of the internet, both ways communication of information worldwide, can be fulfilled with very low bandwidth and today can already be priced at 1 dollar per month per person.
What happens when we allocate resources to enable 1 dollar per month per person internet with megabits of bandwidth and this group of people use it to consume social media and streaming (aka "old days television") old day long?
Yeah, Wikipedia loads at low speeds[0] but I think they specifically design to load on low bandwidth connections.
RANT
Most sites are built for high-end dev machines running OSX and/or chrome. I’m basically the only person running windows and Linux regularly at work and test things in windows for people when they can’t reproduce it anywhere else.
The number of times I’ve informed our editorial team that they are about to publish something full of unprintable characters (that are hidden in OSX but show up as a question mark on Windows) is non-zero. The dev mono-culture is real.
Less:
Solve world peace.
Create "dynamic" organizations.
Establish a colony in Titan.
More:
- Increase by Z the yield of X staple in Y country within the next 5 years.
- Integrate 1 million people to the Internet for less than 1 USD/month/person.