The author favors "pictures" and "videos" over the corrupting influence of the written word.
Suggesting that we read less and watch more television and YouTube has to be satire.
Decrying reading by assaulting readers with a long form essay has to be satire.
Asserting that readers have difficulty with over-abstraction, and arguing this point using analogies instead of concrete citations of harm caused, again, has to be satire.
Because if it isn't, my god what a shitty and grug-minded article.
Suggesting that we read less and watch more television and YouTube has to be satire.
Decrying reading by assaulting readers with a long form essay has to be satire.
Asserting that readers have difficulty with over-abstraction, and arguing this point using analogies instead of concrete citations of harm caused, again, has to be satire.
Because if it isn't, my god what a shitty and grug-minded article.