Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And what's your alternative? Cash under the mattress gets killed by inflation. Gold has its runs but usually underperforms. Bonds also get killed in a downturn.


There is no pure financial alternative. But a reasonable alternative (or complement) is to invest some money in projects/investments that will for sure have a worse expectation than ETFs, but simply bring you joy in life or new learnings.


There might not be an alternative.

However, the example is simply wrong (IMO) since it assumes that within a 30 year timeframe you'll have gained 8% on average (adjusted for inflation). If this would be true, thne yes it would be a decision-making trap. I think that's what morley is getting at.

I'm arguing it's a tough sell that the S&P 500 works like that. If one would agree that the S&P 500 might not continue to give 8% ROI on average over a 30 year time frame, then one might consider doing something else with their money. For example, maybe it's more fruitful to invest in yourself to upskill even more rather than putting your money into the markets. I don't know I haven't researched it, I myself try to beat the market, it's a fun endeavour. The jury is still out.


There are ETFs that invest in international stocks. VT for example. That way you're not betting it all on one country.


That's a good point, betting on the world is a more viable strategy. That is at least, if the world is growing in an economic sense. With that said, since the world population will grow, I'd be willing to make that bet. In this case, I'd say the example holds up.


The point of investing in an ETF is not exactly to bet that the economy will grow no matter what, but to minimize variance and regret with the money you had at the beginning (i.e. you may end up in the red, but in terms of expectations, your likelihood of being in the red was no worse than the average).


Exactly - for me, investment is less about "making it big" and "beating the market," and more about, "storing the value of the work I did to earn this $X."

Such that, if the "burn rate" for my household today is $60k/yr, and I store $60k in investments, then when I withdraw at some future date $X will still be enough to support my household for a year.


The revenue of the S & P is 50% global so pay attention that 1) US ETFs already have huge global exposure and 2) many country ETFs have global corporations in them


Diversification across asset classes.

Physical cash is terrible but to an investor, "cash" tends to mean something like t-bills, which over the past century have done slightly better than inflation. Gold is horrible if you have too much of it, but it tends to do well in equity crashes, so mixing in a little can be helpful. Bonds also sometimes do well when stocks go down, though I think that's more likely when you start at higher interest rates. Commodities can have 15-year bull markets independent of everything else. An investor in Japan would have done fine if they had a lot of foreign stocks. Etc.


Gold has outperformed stocks this year.

https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GLD:NYSEARCA?comparison...

10 year Treasury outperformed NASDAQ https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GLD:NYSEARCA?window=YTD...

That's diversification, even if it just means losing less.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: