Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> it's possible to remove added noise using statistical methods

How do the economics work out on the measures and countermeasures? I would guess that not all noise costs the same to remove.



It's a cat and mouse game as you probably surmise. What the surveillant wants is a clear signal with features corresponding to known information. The surveilee tries to send noise that most closely mimics those features, so the signal is lost in, and cannot be separated from, that noise. The adversaries each try to find a space unknown to the other (much like cryptography - cryptanalysis) (and undiscoverable by the other in a viable timeframe/information set)

For example, speech was traditionally though to be well masked by white noise. But modern filter technology makes short work of removing broadband noise even if the signal is fully buried in it. Instead we now use speech-like fragments as an adversarial mask, as close to the speaker's spectrum and timing as possible.

In terms of computational cost it's not a big deal. If it _can_ be removed it probably can in real-time by a well equipt agent.


Is there a Metasploit equivalent for wireless cat-and-mouse games? If not, what would it take to start one, e.g. live CD with pre-configured GNU radio code/plugins that is compatible with low-cost and USRP SDRs? An awesome-wifi-sensing list could be a starting point for aggregation of OSS projects.


I've no doubt you can do all the necessary number crunching in Octave/Matlab to implement things like a time-domain reflectometer - the DSP is well known in domains like seismology for prospecting, artillery ranging and calculating room shape from sound, as with the image source method.

I think the hard part for an amateur lab is antenna stuff. I am not an RF engineer, nor have I read the linked papers in detail, but I'm guessing that to do this well you need phased arrays or multiple directed YAGI style elements - because all the methods I know from acoustics use multiple microphones, often closely calibrated etc.


There's 1000+ papers on attackers using Wi-Fi sensing, but almost none on defenses, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=4354757827101869878

Wi-ESP is an OSS project for Wi-Fi sensing with low-cost ESP32 devices, https://wrlab.github.io/Wi-ESP/ & https://academic.oup.com/jcde/article/7/5/644/5837600




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: