"you were happy to adopt the BS "definition" from that article."
On the contrary - my comment was lightheartedly criticizing the article for defining web3 in a way which gives no further information, beyond what a sceptical person might already think, thus confirming their suspicions!
I am very interested to hear a real definition of web3, and perhaps debate it a little, if it turns out to be debatable.
On the contrary - my comment was lightheartedly criticizing the article for defining web3 in a way which gives no further information, beyond what a sceptical person might already think, thus confirming their suspicions!
I am very interested to hear a real definition of web3, and perhaps debate it a little, if it turns out to be debatable.