Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The article misses the most important point in those cases: how did the team miss that?

It's very easy to predict the past and find errors when you know the result.

It fricking hard to find errors in your reasoning right now. Why did they think that would work? What did they miss? What error got into their reasoning? Was this destined to fail or it was just bad luck? Could it have worked?

I'd love to read about that kind of stuff.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: