And you're a fool if you think that the fact that there exists no "total anonymity" (pretty much like there exists no uncrackable encryption) is an argument against striving for a feasible level of protection of anonymity rights.
It's not a question whether you can stay anonymous. It's a question of whether you should be allowed to - which you should.
It's not a question whether you can stay anonymous. It's a question of whether you should be allowed to - which you should.