I'm pretty excited for it. I encoded my blog's images to AVIF a year or two ago, and redid them a few weeks ago. (I use <picture> to allow browsers to choose which format to get.)
JPEG XL looks pretty good, too, but current browser support is a flag in Chrome. I wonder if they can squeeze better quality out of low filesizes (0.3~0.6 bits per pixel) to compete better with AVIF.
JPEG XL looks pretty good, too, but current browser support is a flag in Chrome. I wonder if they can squeeze better quality out of low filesizes (0.3~0.6 bits per pixel) to compete better with AVIF.