On: 'Rater' is paid $10 hourly to teach Google's algorithm

[yupper32]

Your ranking is a signal that goes into the algorithm, not the actual end result.

[anm89 → yupper32]

I understand that. My post never implies that that was the case.

> Quality Raters look at websites and answer questions about them.

Wrong. I was never asked any questions beyond to rank to site quality for a query

> Quality Raters don’t actually rank website

Wrong again. This is what we did. We assessed website rankings for specific queries.

[yupper32 → anm89]

Why do you think you're the only type of rater?

[anm89 → yupper32]

I understand that.

> Quality Raters look at websites and answer questions about them.

Wrong. At least in my case. I was never asked any questions beyond to rank to site quality for a query