Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It was. That was the original design, to ask the user for each site. Then people downloaded browsers that did not ask them ... and browser developers switched it off by default.



Not for each site, for each HTTP request. So if you loaded a page with ten inline images Netscape would ask you eleven times if you wanted to accept cookies, unless you said "yes" at some point, and then it would stop asking you for that site.


At which point you'd link the cookies file to /dev/null

Browsers would hold cookies for a session, but not between them.

This is no longer a viable option as:

- There are those who keep browser sessions alive for long periods of time (days, weeks, months, ...)

- Cross-site cookies. (Thanks, Doubleclick, and by Doubleclick, I of course mean Google which produces the most widely-used browser in the world.)

Make the Web Stateless Again.


You can run everything in Incognito.


And I do, particularly on Android.

The main motivator there is actually Google Chrome's abysmal tab management and navigation, as it is all but impossible to clear out tabs in a reasonable manner.

On Firefox, with Tree-Style Tabs, the problem still exists, though it is less severe.

There's still ample opportunity for tracking, unfortunately. I consider both Chrome and Android to be actively user-hostile and privacy-hostile, for what I hope are evident and well-founded reasons. Google's advertising motiviation is powerful.


I agree. Have you tried palemoon?


No. First I've heard of it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: